{ April/24/2014 }


CLE ONLINE STORE
Select your program & register now!




FEATURED CLE
Update on Evidence
PURCHASE ›

News & Articles


January/1/2014

Letter to the Editor

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
(From the January 2014 Newsletter)
I would like to take the time to write you and let you know how  happy I am with your staff. Your employees really took the time to go out of their way returning my phone calls. Explaining proceedures and helped answer any questions that I had pertaining to my divorce. I am thankful to have been accepted in this program. I appreciate all the Rosemary Elacqua-Simmons and Eileen Guinan did to help me complete and fill out the forms. Without this program I do not know what I would have done. I am certainitly grateful. Thank you again!Many Blessings and hope for a wonderful New Year for 2014!
Thank you Again,
Stefa Murray-Waldron

(From the December 2013 Newsletter)

The following was received via e-mail to our Pro Bono Coordinator:

Hi Eileen,
My girlfriend just handed me your article in the ACBA Newsletter and said you have to read this it's amazing you'll love it.  That's exactly what I did.  It brought tears to my eyes.  I loved it and just wanted to say that is so wonderful to know that people like yourself and coworkers are out there.  Thank you for all you do.  Others may not e-mail you but I know they are feeling the same.  You’re a wonderful person.
I know you will continue to help others and you’re so lucky that you’re in a position to do just that.  You must feel very rewarded at times, especially with Pete.  I hope you have the most wonderful Thanksgiving and thank you for sharing your story.  You've touched people's hearts like mine.
Fondly, Samantha Adams

**********************************************
Dear ACBA Newsletter Editor:
 
I do enjoy Michael Friedman's critical views of our court system and I am happy he saw the justice in People v. Shanks, __ AD3d __ (3rd Dep't 2013).  However, he failed to mention what is the most important aspect to this decision.  Ghost, is an American Pitbull Terrier, a breed that has suffered from misunderstanding and exploitation over the last few decades in American society.  In this case, Ghost's owner was walking him on a leash when a German Shepherd Dog (GSD) leashed to a porch railing broke loose and attacked Ghost.  The two dogs got into it and unfortunately as is often the case, the pitbull took the blame when the GSD's owner filed a dangerous dog complaint.  Apart from criticizing the obviously improper remarks of the Town Justice that Mr. Friedman identifies, the Appellate Division correctly applies the Agriculture & Markets Law Section 123 by finding that Ghost injured Ranger in defending himself and therefore did not fall under the definition of a dangerous dog.  The court notes correctly that the Town Justice improperly found that Ghost was at fault due to his breed without any evidence of prior aggression.  I too, like Mr. Friedman, commend Ghost's owner for stepping up and defending her dog - too many in similar situations give into the incorrect application of the Dangerous Dog Law in New York State (a good law by the way when correctly applied!) 

Punish the Deed, not the Breed.  Thank you Third Department!
Helene G. Goldberger, Berne, NY

 






Facebook
LinkedIn




April 2014 NEWSLETTER


Albany County Bar Association
112 State Street, Suite 1120, , Albany, NY 12207 } Tel: 518-445-7691 } Fax: 518-445-7511
Contact Us at: acba@albanycountybar.com

Copyright © Albany County Bar Association, 2014. All rights reserved.

Web Site Design by: Spiral Design Studio